NSW Elections The Aftermath II: Good news!!

I warned you in my last post this was going to be a series!

The election stuff started early this morning as I read the headlines in the SMH.  It is interesting how this article has changed: in the version I read about 7am someone - whether from Treasury or the ALP I cannot remember and the comment has now vanished - claimed the 4.5bn "black hole" was primarily due to including the 4th year of the cycle which is not formally part of the Budget.  Hmmm: doesn't look to me as though the Government has given this its full consideration.

But anyway it doesn't matter, because the Budget can be balanced easily.  Looking at the Electoral Commission website there are 50,062 voters on the roll.  Only 37,484 votes had been counted by mid-day Tuesday as I write this.  That leaves a "black hole' of 12,578 naughty non voters (or one heck of a lot of postal votes).  There are I think 92 electorates so fine all the twerps who didn't vote (and thus deserve the sort of Government they - and unfortunately the rest of us - will get) $500 and there is $577million.  The remaining $4bn could easily be covered by reducing the travel and entertainment budget for politicians.

On 30 March the SMH  finally covered the issue that the lovely Pauline Hanson (that link contains an image unsuitable for those of a gentle disposition) was leading the contest for the final seat in the Legislative Council.  See comments for some discussion of this.  The Herald also included a few pithy (what other sort could they be?) comments from Paul Keating.  If crafting political invective was an Olympic Sport he would be awarded the gold medal in perpetuity: while I don't agree with everything he says, this looks to be spot on.

On 1st April (I don't think the date is significant) the SMH ran a story containing the following:

Greens move into second in Balmain

April 1, 2011
THE Greens are poised to win their first lower house seat after pulling ahead in Balmain. Jamie Parker now leads Labor's Verity Firth by 203 votes, with 89 per cent of the vote counted.  The Coalition's James Falk leads on primary votes but the second-placed candidate is expected to win the seat with the distribution of preferences.
........

Comments

Denis Wilson said…
I assume your numbers refer to your local Electoral Roll.
How would they get money from the unemployed and unemployable?
Obviously not the politically aware such as yourself.
Have you been following the stiff about Pauline Hansen's likely election?
Now, that's scary.
Cheers
Denis
Denis Wilson said…
"stuff about Pauline Hanson's likely election" not "stiff". That's a Freudian Slip I could not bear to leave uncorrected.
Denis
Flabmeister said…
Denis

No, I hadn't realised that was a possibility. It has just upgraded my horror movie metaphor from Halloween to "Nightmare on Elm (or any other) Street.

How come the SMH hasn't had this as a lead story? Are they assuming she would be irrelevant as Libs/Nats plus Shooters etc plus Fred Nile would be a workable majority? The thought of Hansen tweaking Fred Nile various beliefs to match her view of the world is beyond my feeble imagination.

Martin
Flabmeister said…
Denis

I have managed to put thoughts of Pauline emerging from the vault (a nicer word than 'crypt") from my mind so can address your question about extracting money from the unemployed and unemployable.

I will try to avoid a trite response referring to Coalition MPS in the context of your second sentence! Lack of courage again!!

In the UK - under The Vicar (ie Blair) or subsequent PMs - they'd cover this by giving said segments of the community a 'bonus' to cover the cost. They'd then reduce the standard benefit by the same amount so there would be no budget impact (or possibly a benefit if some of the disadvantaged had actually voted).

Given that I suspect the upcoming NSW administration might, philosophically go back two regimes behind Blair, the solution would be to put all the disadvantaged in the RFS or SES. There'll be enough disasters to keep everyone busy!

Of course my key point is that there seems to be a total disjunction between the law of compulsory voting and actually enforcing that.

Martin
Denis Wilson said…
"The Powers That Be" do not want the masses to realise how many of their Subjects simply ignore the obligation to Vote.
They bury the figures, and do not deal with the Lawbreakers, lest it attract attention to how many people simply ignore them as irrelevant.
Do you remember when they prosecuted a Melbourne radical academic for advocating that people turn up, get their names struck off the roll, and then depart without voting?
Can I suggest you read this article from the West Australian?
It is full of delicious ironies.

Cheers
Denis
Flabmeister said…
Thanks for that Denis, most interesting.

It calls to mind a comment heard in the UK last year that something like 50% of speeding fines and property seizure penalties are not enforced. (Which probably explains why, despite the '000s of speed cameras, people passed us all the time when we were driving 5mph above the posted speed limit!)

Popular posts from this blog

A tour of the West (part 1)

Insects from pine trees

Maslins beach rules